Why animal testing is good and bad

by
6.98    9,994 ratings    799 reviews
why animal testing is good and bad

Animal Testing Quotes (8 quotes)

File Name: why animal testing is good and bad.zip
Size: 22662 Kb
Published 05.12.2018

The Truth About Animal Testing for Cosmetics #BeCrueltyFree

The Flaws and Human Harms of Animal Experimentation

I demonstrate that a growing body of scientific literature critically assessing the validity of animal experimentation generally and animal modeling specifically raises important concerns about its reliability and predictive value for human outcomes and for understanding human physiology. The unreliability of animal experimentation across a wide range of areas undermines scientific arguments in favor of the practice. Additionally, I show how animal experimentation often significantly harms humans through misleading safety studies, potential abandonment of effective therapeutics, and direction of resources away from more effective testing methods. The resulting evidence suggests that the collective harms and costs to humans from animal experimentation outweigh potential benefits and that resources would be better invested in developing human-based testing methods. Annually, more than million animals are used worldwide in experimentation or to supply the biomedical industry. Regardless of its categorization, animal experimentation is intended to inform human biology and health sciences and to promote the safety and efficacy of potential treatments. Although it is widely accepted that medicine should be evidence based , animal experimentation as a means of informing human health has generally not been held, in practice, to this standard.

An estimated 26 million animals are used every year in the United States for scientific and commercial testing. Animals are used to develop medical treatments, determine the toxicity of medications, check the safety of products destined for human use, and other biomedical, commercial, and health care uses. Research on living animals has been practiced since at least BC. Proponents of animal testing say that it has enabled the development of many life-saving treatments for both humans and animals, that there is no alternative method for researching a complete living organism, and that strict regulations prevent the mistreatment of animals in laboratories. Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to experiment on animals, that alternative methods available to researchers can replace animal testing, and that animals are so different from human beings that research on animals often yields irrelevant results.

Animal Testing Is It 's Bad And Good At The Sametime

The controversy on animal testing is that it 's bad and good at the sametime. It 's based on protecting humans, not simply producing new life-saving drugs although this is seen as a priority another reason is that animal testing involves the inability of animals to consent to the tests. Humans, it is argued, can make an informed decision to consent while animals have tests forced upon them, with no choice. The controversy started in Abuses of animals during testing were well publicised throughout. The question is not, "Can they reason? But when you think about is it actually legal?

Animal research is a very controversial topic that has been generating heated arguments and debates all around the world over the past few decades. Recently, there appears to be an overwhelming growth in animal right groups all over the world. At the same time, more and more pro-testing groups that support the humane use of animals in research have been forming these proponents argue and recognize the essential role that animal research has played in medical advancements and breakthroughs throughout the years. Imagine for a second, a world where animal research is banned. This is a general disadvantage of in vitro studies; in most cases, the natural environment of the cells or the tissue cannot be easily replicated in a petri dish. The truth of the matter is that the majority, if not all scientists and researchers acknowledge the difficult ethical issues that arise from animal research.

Often the procedures can cause a great deal of suffering. Most animals are killed at the end of an experiment, but some may be re-used in subsequent experiments. Here is a selection of common animal procedures:. Many different species are used around the world, but the most common include mice, fish, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, farm animals, birds, cats, dogs, mini-pigs, and non-human primates monkeys, and in some countries, chimpanzees. Video: Watch what scientists have to say about alternatives to animal testing.

3 COMMENTS

  1. Baldo L. says:

    BBC - Ethics - Animal ethics: Experimenting on animals

  2. Adelfa A. says:

    Discover More

  3. Lily D. says:

    Animal Testing Is Bad Science: Point/Counterpoint . research is the recognition that animals rarely serve as good models for the human body.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *